Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Compensation Common Policies topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff outlines options on salary and benefit requests as JBC delays final decision

Executive Committee of the Legislative Council · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Joint Budget Committee staff presented options on salary structure and benefits (WINS agreement components), flagged substantial health-premium increases (11.4–24%), and said JBC has not yet committed to a full compensation package; legislative management requested a preliminary decision by Feb. 17 to aid agency budgeting.

Craig Harper of Joint Budget Committee staff briefed the Executive Committee on statewide compensation common policies, describing a complex request aligned to the WINS partnership agreement and noting the JBC has not finalized decisions.

Harper summarized four WINS components that factor into this year’s request: a 2% structural adjustment to salary ranges, a 3.1% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), a statutory step-plan implementation, and a 0.4% step-like increase intended to bring parity for nonclassified staff. ‘‘The combination of those ... gives a total increase of 3.5% in salary funding,’’ Harper said. He cautioned DPA’s estimates for the legislative branch are approximate but provided a ballpark figure of about $1.8 million to implement the COLA and step-like increases for legislative staffing.

On benefits, Harper said state-health-plan premiums are rising ‘‘between 11.4 and about 24%’’ depending on the plan, with Cigna plans on the high end and Kaiser on the lower end; under the WINS agreement the state’s proposal would absorb the premium increases so employees’ out-of-pocket shares would not increase for FY27. JBC staff recommended several options for savings, including denying the 2% blanket structural range boost and separating step-plan funding to improve transparency and targeting.

The committee did not take formal action but was told the legislative management team requested a preliminary decision on compensation by February 17 so agencies can build budgets; members were asked to review the materials and follow up before the committee meets again.