Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Homeschool Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears pros and cons of allowing home‑educated students into cocurricular music programs

Revere Local Board of Education (work session) · February 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees discussed a proposed policy to let home‑education students participate in co‑/cocurricular music (band, choir, orchestra) when programs require out‑of‑school attendance; members flagged liability, grading, transportation and precedent concerns and asked for teacher input.

The board examined a proposed change to district policy that would permit home‑educated students to participate in cocurricular music programs at the high school when those programs require attendance outside the school day.

Proponents framed the proposal narrowly—chiefly to preserve continuity for students who participate in elementary music as homeschooled children and to extend access to choir, band or orchestra at the high school. One trustee clarified the ask: “It was specific to band because band is... required attendance outside of the school day,” and similar performing arts programs were discussed as potential analogues.

Trustees and staff raised multiple implementation concerns. Questions included whether non‑enrolled students would be allowed to attend multiple courses in one day, how sign‑in systems (VMS) and the student information system would track non‑enrolled participants, whether grades or credit would be assigned to non‑enrolled students, transportation and instrument provisioning, insurance and liability, discipline and classroom disruption, and the risk that the policy could incentivize families to withdraw entirely from the public program to cherry‑pick electives.

Board members requested further input from music teachers, counselors and legal/HR staff and said they preferred to refine the proposal before any policy change. The board did not adopt new language at the Feb. 10 meeting.