Issaquah reviews MetroFlex performance and weighs circulator or private microtransit options

City of Issaquah City Council · February 10, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Sign Up Free
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Administration presented MetroFlex performance metrics (Issaquah's share plus King County yields a total cost per ride over $40, average wait ~23 minutes, 55% shared trips) and proposed exploring alternatives — a city-run circulator, Circuit, or renegotiated MetroFlex service — with council asking for route-level cost comparisons and Burlington/Bellevue experience.

Andrea Leonard, deputy city administrator, returned to council on Feb. 9 to revisit MetroFlex and microtransit options after council's fall concerns about cost-effectiveness.

Leonard reported that Issaquah pays for one van and driver while King County covers other infrastructure; King County's cost per ride is "a little over $20," she said, and Issaquah's share results in a total cost per ride of "over $40." The administration also reported 55% of trips are shared and an average wait time of roughly 23 minutes; staff noted limitations in data on rider demographics and fare-reduced trips.

Options presented included: (1) continue to work with Metro to change service parameters and hours; (2) a city-run circulator (fixed-route shuttle) estimated as a lower-cost, more predictable option in initial modeling; and (3) Circuit, a private provider with an electric vehicle fleet in other cities. Staff said Circuit indicated flexibility in using purchased service hours for fixed routes or point-to-point options; Uber and Lyft did not submit proposals in time for the meeting.

Council members split on priorities: some urged continuing MetroFlex with better outreach and a focus on equity and last-mile access for seniors and riders without cars; others favored exploring a fixed-route circulator or Circuit's model to get more predictable headways and potentially lower per-ride costs. Several members asked staff to provide route-level assumptions, comparisons with bus operating cost per boarding, the Bellevue experience with Circuit, and refined cost estimates before council chooses a path.

Next steps: staff will return with more detailed cost modeling and usage data (including the effects of a recent MetroFlex service-area change), pursue additional vendor proposals and community outreach, and present refined options later this year.