Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tort Claims topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances bill after discussion of repeated flooding in Spavanaugh
Summary
The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced Senate Bill 16-38 after debate about repeated home flooding in the Uchi/Spavanaugh area and questions about the Governmental Tort Claims Actstatute of limitations; sponsor urged access to justice and the bill passed on a unanimous roll call.
Get email alerts on the Tort Claims topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Bill 16-38, a constituent-request measure tied to repeated residential flooding in the Uchi/Spavanaugh area near Tulsa, was advanced by the Senate Judiciary Committee after members raised questions about timing for filing claims under the Governmental Tort Claims Act.
The sponsor described ongoing flooding tied to local buildout in the Uchi/Spavanaugh area and said affected homeowners have "their homes got flooded, at least once, maybe twice," and that coordination with Tulsa city officials had not produced a solution. Committee members asked whether the prospect of future flooding means the condition is "ongoing" for purposes of the statute of limitations under the Governmental Tort Claims Act.
In closing, Senator Woods said, "When it comes to trying to seek damages under the Tort Act, nobody should be priced out of justice," urging legislators to avoid procedural bars that could deny access to compensation. Following a brief exchange about when the statutory clock would begin running, the committee voted to pass the measure; the clerk recorded seven ayes and zero nays and the chair declared the bill passed.
The committee did not record an amendment to SB 16-38 during this session. The next procedural step is floor scheduling consistent with the Legislature's rules. If legal deadlines or remedies are time-sensitive, affected residents would need to track statutory filing windows and any further committee or floor action.
