Senate committee advances bill to widen sources for immunization recommendations after debate over CDC credibility
Loading...
Summary
S.84916, introduced by Senator Hinchey, would allow health-care practitioners to order and administer immunizations recommended by nationally recognized health-care organizations or interstate review bodies in addition to the federal Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Committee members debated whether state law should be changed based on perceptions of federal agency reliability; the bill was reported to the floor.
Senate Bill 84916, introduced in committee as a measure to amend Education Law and Insurance Law, would permit health-care practitioners to order and administer immunizations recommended by nationally recognized health-care organizations or by interstate review bodies in addition to recommendations from the federal Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), committee staff said Feb. 10.
Staff noted letters of support from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Community Pharmacy Association of New York State, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the New York Academy of Family Physicians. Committee members engaged in an extended discussion about the policy rationale and potential consequences of broadening the authoritative sources for vaccine recommendations.
A committee member criticized current federal leadership at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and said that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC had been treated as "the gospel," but that some now view the agency as unreliable. The unnamed member said that shift is part of the impetus for the bill. The comment, in the transcript, read: "During COVID, CDC was the gospel, but now... the CDC is not reliable and others need to make the recommendation."
Other members framed the bill differently. The committee chair acknowledged a recognized need to raise vaccination rates, saying the percentage of people being vaccinated "is going down" and that expanding who may administer vaccines is intended to respond to that decline by increasing access. Senator May said she was "very sad" that the state needs this law and expressed concern about federal public-health leadership; Senator Payne and Senator Dennardis described confusion among parents, schools and the medical community and supported broader state-level guidance and more authorized vaccinators to provide stability.
Willie Quill, the committee's assistant counsel, provided a legal clarification: school-enrollment vaccination requirements exist in the Public Health Law and are beyond the scope of this bill. Quill said the bill does not change enrollment requirements but would broaden the set of people who may administer immunizations, subject to training and supervision requirements stated in the bill text.
After discussion, Senator Jackson moved the bill and the committee reported S.84916 to the Senate floor by voice vote. The committee transcript records statements of support from medical organizations and multiple senators; it does not include a roll-call tally of individual aye or no votes.
The next procedural step is for the bill to be considered by the full Senate; the committee record does not specify a floor calendar date.
