Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Use Of Force topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates injury, use-of-force thresholds and complaint counting for racial profiling reports
Summary
Members recommended using statutory definitions for bodily injury and agreed to capture all formal racial-profiling complaints (sustained or not) to provide context; they also discussed practical undercapture of low-level pain complaints in real-time reporting.
Committee members debated how to record bodily injury and use-of-force in traffic-stop reporting and how to capture racial-profiling complaints and disciplinary outcomes.
Legal counsel pointed committee members to the penal-code definition of bodily injury, which several speakers said should guide reporting thresholds. One member noted, however, that lower-level complaints of pain (for example from handcuffing) are often not captured in the traffic-stop data because officers do not complete use-of-force reports in the field and follow-up documentation can be disconnected from the original stop.
On complaints, members generally favored collecting counts of all formal racial-profiling allegations — sustained or not — and tracking how many resulted in disciplinary actions to provide context for complaint volume. The committee asked subcommittees to return with proposed wording and format for recording injuries and complaints in the standardized template.
