Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Military Affairs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee flags statutory wording around the National Guard adjutant general and inspector general for housekeeping fix
Summary
Members told counsel they believe the titles "adjutant" and "inspector general" are distinct roles and asked legislative counsel to prepare long‑form language to remove or clarify 'inspector general' from election language; counsel said change appears feasible but recommended consulting the National Guard and coordinating timing with elections.
A short‑form bill (H.811) concerning the election of the adjutant general and inspector general prompted committee members to question whether the statute accurately reflects current organization at the Vermont National Guard.
Several representatives said the adjutant general and the inspector general are separate positions and noted the inspector general referenced in statute appears to be a federal position at the guard base. Members raised transparency concerns that voters could be confused when a ballot references an office that, in practice, has duties carried out by different individuals.
Legislative counsel Sophie Sedat reported she reviewed the statutory language and said the historical combination of titles appears to be a relic. Counsel indicated there is no immediate legal barrier to clarifying the title to elect the adjutant general alone, but advised checking with the National Guard to ensure no operational conflicts.
The committee asked counsel to prepare long‑form language and consider folding the fix into a larger modernization or housekeeping package; members also flagged ballot printing and timing considerations to avoid disrupting the imminent election process. Committee did not take a vote and agreed to revisit the language once counsel drafts specific statutory text.
