Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Job Description topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chesterfield committee narrows county administrator ad, flags vision/physical requirements
Summary
The Chesterfield County Rules and Personnel Committee reviewed the county administrator job description, questioned vision and physical requirements that could exclude qualified applicants, and authorized staff to draft an advertisement to be circulated to the committee and full council; platforms discussed included LinkedIn, Indeed and the Association of Counties.
Get email alerts on the Job Description topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Chesterfield County Rules and Personnel Committee on the floor reviewed the draft county administrator job description and agreed to have staff draft a shortened advertisement emphasizing minimum experience and qualifications for committee and council approval.
Speaker 1 opened the meeting and said the purpose was to review the job description and decide how to advertise so the ad can run. "That's the basic purpose," Speaker 1 said.
Speaker 2 questioned specific physical and vision items listed in the draft, asking, "Why does it have to have things like color discrimination and manual dexterity? Do we need those things in there?" Speaker 2 said such requirements could exclude otherwise qualified applicants, citing friends who are colorblind.
Speaker 6 responded that those items are employment‑law matters and noted accommodations are possible: "There's always a requirement of if they can do the job with a reasonable accommodation." Committee members agreed the full job description is a comprehensive record but that the external advertisement should omit or simplify technical specifics.
On qualifications, Speaker 6 recommended stressing minimum training and experience in the advertisement to focus applicants. The draft cites at least five years in senior local government leadership as a baseline; Speaker 6 said the ad should retain flexible language—"any equivalent combination of training and experience"—to avoid excluding experienced candidates who do not meet a strict degree requirement.
Members debated whether to list a salary range. Speaker 4 asked whether to publish a range or use language such as "salary based on experience"; several members preferred "based on experience" to avoid deterring qualified applicants while still signaling competitive pay.
The committee discussed outreach channels for the posting. Members suggested LinkedIn, the state Association of Counties, the regional COG website (referred to in the meeting as "PB/PD COG"), Indeed and possibly the Chamber of Commerce; there was discussion that newspaper advertising had been used previously but is costly. Speaker 2 said staff had already contacted some outlets and would follow up with Maceo (the transcript uses both "Macio" and "Maceo" in different places) to confirm previously used channels.
Speaker 6 volunteered to draft a concise advertisement that pulls key qualifications from the full description and circulate it to the committee and the full county council for a "thumbs up/thumbs down" decision. "I'll be glad to do that," Speaker 6 said. The committee authorized staff to prepare the ad and agreed members could approve it via circulation to avoid an extra meeting. Resumes will be directed to the clerk's office for distribution to committee members.
Procedurally, the committee also adopted the meeting agenda and approved the minutes from 01/24/2024 earlier in the session. The committee adjourned after taking these steps.
Next steps: staff will prepare the advertisement with emphasis on minimum qualifications and reasonable‑accommodation language, confirm the final set of advertising platforms (LinkedIn, Indeed, Association of Counties, PB/PD COG, Chamber of Commerce and other online job boards as identified), circulate the ad to committee and council for approval, and accept resumes through the clerk's office for committee review.

