Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Reinstatement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board recommends probation terms after DPH presents reinstatement packet for surrendered license

Connecticut Board of Nursing · February 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

DPH recommended a typical 4-year consent order with an initial period during which the applicant may not practice; board members debated whether to require 6, 9 or 12 months of non-practice before allowing supervised return and asked DPH to include specific support-group and monitoring terms.

The board reviewed a reinstatement request from Cherish Ostrowski, RN, who voluntarily surrendered her license in 2016. Dana Dalton, a nurse consultant with the Department of Public Health, presented the applicant’s file and recommended a standard consent order: four years of probation and a requirement that the applicant demonstrate compliance for an initial period before resuming practice.

"We were recommending a typical reinstatement consent order with 4 years of probation," Dalton said, recommending that the applicant demonstrate six months of compliance before returning to practice while under DPH monitoring.

Board members debated the length of a no-practice period. Lisa Freeman said she was concerned that Ostrowski had said support groups were not helpful to her and recommended a longer monitored break, saying she would be "more comfortable with 12 months" but could accept nine months as a middle ground. Salvatore Diaz argued for a six-month non-practice start so the applicant can return under monitoring and face workplace stressors to test stability.

Members generally supported a four-year probationary monitoring framework, while asking DPH to insert clearer terms on support-group participation, urine-screen frequency and reporting. Dalton indicated the DPH monitoring office would operationalize the order and that the board’s recommendations were sufficient for the agency to draft a consent order.

No final vote was taken; the board provided recommendations to DPH staff for drafting the consent order and monitoring terms.