Neighbors oppose APS temporary electrical skid; McAllen commission tables permit for outreach and review
Loading...
Summary
Residents opposed a two-year conditional-use permit for an APS temporary electrical skid proposed on city-owned land near Buddy Owens, citing noise, aesthetics and property-value concerns. AEP representatives described a 50-by-100-foot footprint and urgent summer readiness needs; the commission voted to table the item pending further outreach and staff follow-up.
McAllen commissioners on Feb. 9 tabled a conditional-use permit request from APS for a temporary electrical “skid” on city-owned property after residents objected to its proposed location near a residential block.
Residents told the commission the skid would sit “right in the front of our homes” and could produce noise and visual impacts. Lupita Valentina, who identified herself as a nearby resident, said, “I wish that they would leave our neighborhood alone.” Several speakers said they feared the temporary use would become effectively permanent if renewed.
AEP representatives and city staff said the skid is a short-term measure to meet growing demand in a densely serviced corridor. Daniel Lucio, an AEP representative, described the installation as smaller than an existing facility and gave dimensions: “It’s 50 by a 100 foot instead of 250 by 250.” He told the commission the installation would take under two months and AEP is actively seeking a permanent site.
An AEP spokesperson also proposed direct outreach: “We would like to propose having an open house” to show residents what the skid would look like and answer questions, the company said.
Commissioners pressed AEP on alternatives and permanence; one commissioner noted earlier skids were sited before neighborhoods developed and asked how the city would prevent a temporary permit from becoming permanent. City staff and AEP said the request was for two years to allow time to find a permanent location and to ensure reliable service ahead of peak summer demand.
Given lingering community concerns and a desire for more neighbor engagement, the commission voted to table the item and asked staff to pursue further investigation and meetings with neighbors before returning the matter to the agenda.
