Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Steamship Coordination topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory committee seeks planning and transportation staff engagement on ferry terminal alignment with Easy Street designs
Summary
Committee members asked staff to pursue staff‑to‑staff coordination with planning and transportation leaders and to invite Leslie Snell and Mike Burns to a March 10 agenda item to align Easy Street design options with the Steamship Authority’s long-range plans.
Get email alerts on the Steamship Coordination topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members of the Coastal Advisory Committee spent a sustained portion of the Feb. 10 meeting probing how Easy Street’s designs would interface with plans for the Steamship Authority terminal and broader transportation needs. The committee emphasized the need to avoid mismatched elevations or incompatible routing between town-led road-raising and the Steamship Authority’s terminal work.
Councillor Doug Rose described the Easy Street work as “the existential project in the entire CRP” and proposed asking Hillary Hedges, the committee’s planning representative, to put the ferry/terminal alternative on the agenda of the NP and EDC for a formal discussion. The transcript records discussion of the motion but does not show a formal roll-call vote on that motion. Instead the committee agreed on a pragmatic next step: staff-led outreach and an agenda item for March 10 that would invite Town planning staff and the transportation coordinator.
Joanna Roach suggested starting by inviting Leslie Snell (planning staff) to CRAC so the department can explain how it would be involved; Hill agreed and recommended also inviting Mike Burns, the transportation coordinator. Peter, the committee chair, and other members favored a staff-to-staff meeting or having Leslie and Mike attend the CRAC meeting as a precursor to taking the subject to NP and EDC. The committee asked staff to confirm availability and place the topic on the March 10 agenda if the invitees can attend.
Members also urged that staff prepare clear briefing materials and comparative feasibility analysis before elevating relocation or alternate-terminal concepts to regional planning bodies. Matt Fee and others argued the question of moving the Steamship Authority is a planning-level feasibility issue that would require consultants and cost estimates.

