Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals Court hears challenge to registry dissemination where registrant under GPS and probation conditions
Summary
In Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board, counsel disputed whether the hearing examiner made an individualized, particularized efficacy finding to justify active public dissemination; registrant argued GPS monitoring and exclusion zones undermine the need, while Board counsel said multiple risk factors and a broad victim pool warranted disclosure despite GPS and supervisory measures.
The panel considered 24P1264, Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board, a contested administrative appeal about whether the Board’s hearing examiner properly found active internet dissemination and public availability of registrant information necessary.
Counsel for the registrant argued the Board failed to make a particularized efficacy finding and said the record lacked evidence showing…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
