Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appellate panel probes admissibility of secretly recorded audio and late‑produced photos in civil trial

Judicial - Appeals Court Oral Arguments · February 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In Belkounis v. Fardy, appellants alleged the trial court erred by admitting a secretly recorded audio recording (alleged Wiretap Act issue, Mass. Gen. Laws ch.272 §99) and photographs disclosed late in discovery; counsel said the recording was played repeatedly and could have prejudiced the jury, while opposing counsel and trial counsel argued civil rules and damages remedies differ from criminal suppression doctrines.

The panel heard argument in 25P0339, concerning alleged trial‑level evidentiary errors including admission of an audio recording made without all parties’ knowledge and the late introduction of photographs that the appellants said were sanctioned out of evidence.

Patricia Gary, representing the appellant, argued that the recording was obtained and used in a manner inconsistent with the Wiretap Act (Mass. Gen. Laws ch.272 §99) and that its…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans