Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Volusia County adopts contested rewrite of Chapter 72 zoning rules amid protests
Summary
After hours of public comment and heated debate, the county council approved amendments to Chapter 72 that move dozens of special‑exception land uses to PLDRC review, conditional‑use or by‑right processes, prompting opposition from residents who said the changes reduce public hearings and elected oversight.
The Volusia County Council on Sept. 4 narrowly approved a rewrite of Chapter 72 of the county zoning code that reclassifies many land uses and shifts final approval authority for dozens of special exceptions from the county council to the Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC) or to administrative/by‑right approvals.
Planning and development staff framed the changes as a trimming of regulatory steps intended to speed permitting and reduce duplicative hearings. Carol McFarland, interim growth and resource management director, told the council staff corrected scrivener errors and proposed, in some limited cases, that FDAC certification be required for aquaculture to be treated differently.
But the approval touched off an hours‑long public hearing filled with opponents who said the changes remove essential public notice and the ability of elected representatives to adjudicate controversial projects. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," one speaker said. Critics ranged from environmental groups and neighborhood associations to residents of Spruce Creek and Osteen, who warned that by‑right changes could allow heavy industrial or site‑sensitive uses to move forward without council review.
Council debate focused on balancing streamlining and protecting neighborhood rights. Several council members said many past PLDRC recommendations were later ratified by council and that moving some items to PLDRC could save months of delay for routine requests. Opponents countered that special exceptions exist precisely because certain uses can have outsized local impacts—noise, traffic, pollution or flooding—and deserve elected review.
The council approved the ordinance after staff made listed corrections; the final vote was 4–3. Supporters said the planning process still allows appeals to council after PLDRC action and emphasized administrative safeguards; opponents warned that shifting authority reduces public participation and could produce unintended consequences for flood‑prone and overlay areas. Several residents said they planned to pursue legal options if necessary.
Next steps: staff will publish the corrected ordinance language and begin implementation; affected applicants and neighbors will see changes in which projects require PLDRC hearings, by‑right permits or conditional‑use review. Appeals procedures remain available, and some council members said they will monitor impacts and return with tweaks if needed.
