Dozens testify urging Allegheny County to bar cooperation with ICE as crowds fill council chamber
Loading...
Summary
Roughly 90 people signed up for public comment and many urged passage of ordinance 13809‑26 to prohibit county cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, arguing that local cooperation undermines public safety, due process and trust in county services.
A large and sustained public comment period at the Allegheny County Council meeting centered on proposed ordinance 13809‑26, which would limit county employees' cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Dozens of residents, nonprofit leaders, attorneys and faith leaders addressed the council in favor of the ordinance. Speakers described recent federal immigration enforcement actions in other cities and in the region, said county resources should not be used to assist ICE, and warned that cooperation with federal immigration enforcement chills reporting of crime, access to social services and participation in court proceedings.
Several speakers who identified legal and policy experience told the council that the ordinance would not amount to a sanctuary city policy or jeopardize federal funding. One speaker summarized legal principles: "This bill does not violate federal law ... It simply says that county employees will not" assist ICE beyond what federal law requires (speaker attributed in transcript).
A number of speakers offered personal testimony about family members detained, experiences of fear when interacting with county services, and the effect on survivors of domestic violence who may avoid seeking help. Faith leaders and immigrant‑serving groups urged the council to codify protections to ensure that county facilities and employees do not function as extensions of federal civil immigration enforcement.
Union representatives and trade groups also spoke in favor of the ordinance, saying that immigrant workers are vital to local industries and that fear of enforcement is deterring workers from applying to jobs and attending hiring events.
Organizers and coalition representatives presented written letters — the transcript cites a coalition led by the Global Switchboard and a list of 141 organizations and thousands of residents endorsing the ordinance; one speaker said 3,701 Allegheny County residents had signed in support between Jan. 26 and the date of the meeting.
Council members in attendance heard the testimony; some had already signaled support for the ordinance (the county executive said earlier in her remarks she would sign it if it reached her desk). The meeting record shows the large public turnout and that the council will consider the ordinance further in committee (per separate committee notices recorded during the meeting).
