Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the PUD Amendment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Stuart redevelopment board recommends approval of Avonlea Commercial Corners East site plan

Community Redevelopment Board, City of Stuart · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Community Redevelopment Board unanimously recommended approval of a major amendment and site plan (Ordinance No. 2550‑2026) for Avonlea Commercial Corners East, Lot 11: a 0.9‑acre parcel with a proposed ~6,827‑sq‑ft commercial building, 50% open space, and developer‑funded public art. Staff said the amendment does not increase overall PUD density.

The Community Redevelopment Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of Ordinance No. 2550‑2026, a major amendment to the New Avonlea Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Parcel D, Lot 11 (Avonlea Commercial Corners East).

Jody Coogler, the city’s development director, presented the staff recommendation. Coogler said Lot 11 is a 0.9‑acre parcel inside the Community Redevelopment Area; the applicant seeks site‑plan approval for a single‑story commercial building designed to accommodate a mix of retail, office, restaurant and medical uses. Staff reported the proposed site plan does not increase the PUD’s overall density or intensity and conforms to the City’s land development code and comprehensive plan. Public notices were mailed to adjacent property owners on 01/19/2026, and staff recommended forwarding a recommendation of approval to the City Commission under Ordinance No. 2550‑2026.

Applicant representatives described the Lot 11 building as approximately 6,827 square feet — a much smaller build‑out than the PUD’s maximum allowance of 15,000 square feet for that parcel — with significant open space (applicant proposes 50% open space where the PUD requires a minimum 25%). The applicant also discussed landscaping plans and a public‑art requirement; the developer indicated public art is typically paid for by the developer (city may accept funds into a public art fund).

Board members asked technical questions about the master parcel plan exhibits, tree mitigation and the currency of impact‑fee analysis; staff said the city’s most recent impact‑fee update was completed in 2022 (adopted 2022) and that the traffic consultant had determined the project meets minimum standards. The applicant and development team emphasized that Lot 11’s site plan meets applicable development standards and requested the board’s recommendation.

Following discussion, a board member moved to recommend approval; the motion was seconded and passed by unanimous roll call. The board’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Commission for final action under Ordinance No. 2550‑2026.