Committee tables bill to add one‑year mandatory minimum for certain felony eluding cases
Loading...
Summary
Patron sought a mandatory one‑year minimum for felony eluding when forcible stop techniques were used; opponents argued mandatory minimums strip judicial discretion. A substitute motion to table HB 99 passed 7–3.
Delegate Ballard described HB 99 as a response to officer‑involved pursuits and forcible‑stop techniques. The bill would add a mandatory minimum one‑year confinement to the class‑6 felony for felony eluding where certain aggravating factors (use of spike strips, PIT/boxing techniques, or vehicle contact with law enforcement vehicle) are proven at sentencing.
Questions from members focused on what qualifies as “equipment” and whether judges already consider such factors at sentencing. Counsel and the patron explained that judges can consider those aggravating facts but that a mandatory minimum would require the court to impose one year if the Commonwealth proves the listed aggravators.
Class Justice for Virginia and other civil‑justice groups opposed mandatory minimums, arguing they remove judicial discretion and do not deter crime. After debate, the subcommittee voted to table HB 99 by a roll call of 7–3.
What’s next: HB 99 was tabled by the subcommittee and will not advance in this posture; the meeting record shows the tabling vote was 7–3.
