Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fleet Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission reviews multi‑year apparatus plan, to ask Board of Finance for $1.5 million to replace engine

New Canaan Fire Commission · February 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Presenters laid out a 15–20 year fleet plan that targets replacement of first‑line engines on a roughly 10‑year cycle, proposes a $1.5 million financing request to begin replacement of Engine 7, and debated refurbishing the tanker vs. buying new amid concerns about electrical and grounding problems.

Commissioners heard a multi‑year apparatus maintenance and replacement plan and discussed near‑term funding options during the fleet status report.

The presenter said the plan targets a roughly 10‑year first‑line service for engines (with NFPA guidance noted for longer service life) and recommended starting the replacement process for Engine 7 by asking the Board of Finance to secure financing. "That ask is going to be for $1.5 million, for replacement of the first 2 engine," the presenter said. The timeline presented assumes 3–4 years for specification and build time before delivery.

Commissioners debated whether to refurbish the tanker or pursue a new vehicle, noting irregularities in the refurb spec and unresolved electrical/grounding issues that might shorten the post‑refurb service life. One commissioner warned that incomplete specs could push refurb costs toward the price of a new apparatus; others suggested Fleet Image could do targeted repairs in the short term.

The report also discussed a possible 'mini pumper' as a lower‑cost, versatile alternative to a reserve engine and early planning for a second station in the early 2030s. Operational tradeoffs were raised: shifting a tanker to fewer responses could buy time to evaluate replacement versus refurbishing, and crew and pump reliability remain priorities.

Separately, the commission discussed a pending pump‑shift repair and pump test (previously estimated at $7,600) and a contingency funding ask mentioned in the meeting. The presenter said pump repairs would be funded from contingency while scheduling constraints with an indoor facility are resolved.

Next steps: the commission will forward a financing request to the Board of Finance for consideration, refine equipment specs (including electrical/grounding requirements), and report back with more detailed cost estimates and procurement options.