Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Conveyance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate committee rejects a conveyance in lieu of taxes for roadway parcels after documentation concerns

Committee on Housing, Transportation, Infrastructure and Telecommunications, Legislature of the U.S. Virgin Islands · February 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee voted to disapprove a proposed conveyance of several Saint Croix roadway parcels in lieu of unpaid real‑property taxes after legal staff said the paperwork did not clearly identify the parcels to be transferred; the Lieutenant Governor's office and Department of Sports, Parks & Recreation had supported the transfer for a planned bike/coasting park.

Saint Croix Renaissance Group asked the committee to approve a transfer of several roadway plots to the government in satisfaction of unpaid real‑property taxes for tax years 2016–2019. The Lieutenant Governor’s tax assessor submitted a valuation of the combined roadway plots at $535,400 and reported unpaid taxes of $531,608.06 (including penalties and interest). The Office of the Lieutenant Governor and the tax assessor recommended approval under title 33 §24‑94a because the assessed value exceeded the tax liability.

Department of Sports, Parks & Recreation confirmed it would accept the parcels for a proposed Houston Cornelius bike/coasting park and discussed public‑use plans in testimony. SCRG representatives said the transfer would also satisfy contractual obligations under an Economic Development Commission (EDC) agreement that required in‑kind land contributions.

Committee counsel and several senators raised a procedural issue: the SCRG submission and supporting documents did not clearly state which specific parcels were being conveyed in lieu of taxes and whether the same parcels were intended to meet separate EDC obligations. Because the statutory swap under §24‑94a requires explicit property identification and because documentation was ambiguous, the committee approved a motion to disapprove the conveyance and instructed the Lieutenant Governor’s office to return with clear documentation and a parcel‑by‑parcel submission. The roll call recorded 4 yeas with members present voting to disapprove and several senators absent.