Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners shift funds, approve prosecutor staff raises and other mid‑year payroll adjustments
Summary
After debate about available insurance savings and remaining cash, commissioners approved a package moving roughly $92,985 (with benefits) to prosecutor staff salaries, $14,000 to district court clerks, and separately approved a $45,500 increase for the elected prosecutor; the latter passed 2–1 after a request for outside legal review.
Teton County commissioners approved a set of mid‑year budget changes on the recommendation of county staff to reallocate remaining cash and insurance savings for staff pay adjustments.
Clerk and budget staff outlined a plan to use over‑budgeted insurance savings and the removal of a vacant patrol deputy position to fund a series of pay adjustments across departments. Staff described the combined package as including roughly $92,985 (including benefits) to fund prosecutor‑office staff increases and $14,000 transferred to district court salaries to equalize pay grades, plus a separate proposed increase to the elected prosecutor’s salary totaling roughly $45,500 when benefits are included.
Commissioners debated whether an elected official’s salary may be changed mid‑year; one commissioner asked for outside legal review. The board split the package into two separate motions: (1) to increase prosecutor‑office staff salaries (48,500 reported in discussion as the staff component) and to transfer $14,000 from general fund to district court salaries (approved unanimously), and (2) to increase the elected prosecuting attorney’s salary by $35,000 base (about $45,500 with benefits), which passed on a 2–1 vote. Commissioner Powers voted no on the elected‑official increase and requested a finding of necessity to obtain an independent legal opinion on the mid‑year raise.
Commissioners also discussed using a pool of funds for one‑time items (animal services/PAWS contract support was discussed at a proposed $15,000 level) and agreed to revisit outcomes and implementation details. The board asked staff to document exact funding sources and to return with final budget amendments for posting and recordation.
