Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Marriage Equality topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears broad public support for constitutional amendment to protect marriage equality
Summary
CACR 25, a proposed state constitutional amendment to enshrine marriage equality and equal treatment for marriages, drew dozens of supporters and personal testimony this week. Sponsors argued the amendment would insulate New Hampshire from potential federal reversals; opponents questioned whether marriage belongs in the constitution.
Representative Alice Wade introduced CACR 25 as an amendment to enshrine the right to marry and to ensure equal treatment of marriages and spouses under New Hampshire law regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity or race. Wade cited polling showing strong public support and called for proactive protection in light of recent federal court developments.
The public record included a string of supportive witnesses: leaders and members of LGBTQ advocacy groups, couples who described the practical legal significance of marriage (health care visitation, tax and Social Security benefits, parental rights), and civic leaders who urged putting the amendment on the ballot. Kim Lawrence said, “This resolution is simple and necessary,” and multiple witnesses described personal experiences where marriage recognition mattered for everyday legal protections.
Opponents and skeptics questioned whether adding marriage to the state constitution was the right vehicle; one witness argued marriage has little presence in the constitution and that alternative statutory approaches could be preferable. Committee discussion noted the high threshold for constitutional amendments and the need to craft clear ballot language to avoid past losses.
What happens next: The committee closed public testimony and will consider whether to recommend the amendment to the full House and, if approved there, to the ballot. Sponsors said they believe the measure would command the two‑thirds voter threshold based on polling.
Sources: Sponsor testimony, numerous public witnesses for and against CACR 25.
