Panel advances bill to license naturopathic physicians in Florida
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
HB 223 would create licensure, define scope and a Board of Naturopathic Medicine administered by the Department of Health; proponents argued it improves access and accountability while some medical groups waved opposition. Committee reported the bill favorably, 15‑0.
Representative Smith presented HB 223 to establish licensure, scope-of-practice definitions and a Board of Naturopathic Medicine under the Department of Health.
Smith said the bill creates a regulatory framework similar to other professions and noted naturopathic physicians are not medical doctors: "They’re not gonna treat your cancer. They’re not gonna deliver your baby," Smith said, describing the proposal as defining a clear ‘‘swim lane’’ and setting education and exam requirements.
Proponents included Todd Robinson, president of the Florida Naturopathic Physicians Association; Dr. Ramona Shires, who said licensure creates accountability and improves preventive care in rural Northwest Florida; James Monroe, a naturopathic doctor who serves on the Florida Board of Naturopathic Physicians; and Roberta Renault, a registered nurse who described personal health improvements after coordinated care with a naturopathic doctor.
Representatives of organized medicine — including the Florida Osteopathic Medical Association and the Florida Medical Association — waved in opposition but did not offer in‑person testimony. Representative Harris praised sponsor outreach during negotiations and closed debate.
The committee voted 15‑0 to report HB 223 favorably. The bill would create new occupational regulation and a board; details of licensure fees and specific regulatory standards would be set in rulemaking if the measure advances.