Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Recruiting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Osage County approves BirdDog recruiting engagement to fill county controller, pending legal review

Osage County Board of Commissioners · February 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners voted to accept a recruitment proposal from BirdDog Recruitment & Consulting to search for a county controller, pending legal review of the contract; board members debated job scope, potential costs and whether the county should add a salaried controller position.

Osage County, Kan. — The Osage County Board of Commissioners voted Feb. 10 to accept a proposal from BirdDog Recruitment & Consulting to conduct the county controller recruitment, pending legal review of the final engagement contract.

Staff presented two local recruiting options and fee structures, including Premier/Key Staffing (flat fee and percentage structures including a 50% follow‑up fee for replacement searches) and BirdDog, which offers a replacement search at no additional professional fee if the selected candidate leaves within an initial guarantee period. Commissioners asked staff to clarify controller duties, which were described as front-end financial oversight (accounts payable, payroll, benefits and assistance in budget preparation) and as a managerial position that could require staffing support.

Why it matters: The creation or hiring of a county controller would move several financial administration duties from consultants or other offices into a central, permanent position. Commissioners debated budgetary impacts and operational benefits: some described the position as a way to bring financial work in-house and improve day-to-day support for county offices; others questioned whether the county is large enough to justify a salaried controller and associated staff costs.

Board action and vote: The board moved to accept BirdDog's proposal, pending legal review of the engagement contract, and the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote. During the discussion, at least one commissioner explicitly opposed hiring the position at this time citing added budgetary commitments.

Next steps: The commission approved proceeding with BirdDog pending legal review; staff will return with final contract documents for legal review and subsequent formal engagement. The planning and budget implications identified during debate will be subject to the county's budget cycle.