Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County opens five contractor bids, votes to take them under advisement and notify bidders on Feb. 24

Unspecified county bid opening · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a brief county bid-opening session, officials accepted late bids submitted before the 10:30 opening, opened five contractor proposals with amounts recorded, and voted to take the bids under advisement and notify bidders on Feb. 24; a recommendation is expected then.

Speaker 2 called the meeting to order at 10:30 and asked for a motion to accept bids submitted before the bid-opening time. Speaker 3 moved to accept all bids given to John prior to 10:30; Speaker 2 seconded and the voice motion passed.

Speaker 2 then asked John with Interstates Engineering to verify the bids and conduct the opening. "So we did receive, 5 bids," Speaker 1 announced as bids were opened and read aloud. Speaker 1 said there were no addendums and that each bid bond was enclosed and signed.

Speaker 1 read the five bids into the record: Heart 7 Enterprises — $351,650.00; Bishop Inc. — $194,449.00; R L Lindbergh Construction — $243,160.00; Top Construction — $336,890.00; and SitePro Services — $299,360.00. Speaker 1 also stated the bid due time had been 10:00 a.m., with the opening scheduled for 10:30 a.m., and reminded the meeting that the county "reserves the right to reject any or all bids for anything in their best interest" and may "waive any informalities."

Speaker 1 said staff would check the bids for accuracy and that a recommendation would likely be made at the Feb. 24 meeting. Speaker 3 moved to "take the bids under advisement and inform the bidders [on] February 24," a motion seconded by Speaker 1; the motion passed by voice vote. The meeting concluded after a motion to adjourn, which also passed.

The record lists the five bidders and amounts as read into the public record; the county will review the submissions and issue a recommendation at a later meeting. No roll-call vote or individual vote tallies were recorded in the transcript.