Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Testing And Assessment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District presentation: fall EOC proficiency up overall; Math I reported at 98% pre‑retest

Burke County Board of Education (Burke County Schools) · February 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dr. Abernathy told the board that fall EOC proficiency rose versus 2024, that this year’s fall retest could be averaged into proficiency and growth measures, and that the district will use the North Carolina model for a third elementary check‑in.

Dr. Christy Abernathy presented the district’s fall end‑of‑course (EOC) and mid‑year check‑in testing results at the special-call meeting.

Abernathy told the board that initial fall test scores rose in several subjects versus 2024. She said the district was able to average fall retest scores this year because state rules allowed retests to be included for proficiency and growth counts; after averaging retests, several subject areas increased further. Citing a notable figure, Abernathy said, "We're at 98% proficient right now for all students in the fall" on Math I (reported as the pre‑retest figure presented to the board).

For elementary and middle grades the district used locally created check‑ins for the first two administrations; Abernathy said the third check‑in will use the North Carolina model to provide additional practice ahead of EOG assessments. Middle‑school data showed targeted dips in seventh‑grade reading and math and some movement in eighth‑grade math; Abernathy said conversations are underway to identify students needing additional supports.

Board members asked whether choosing the third check‑in as the North Carolina model could affect adaptability rules; Abernathy explained the North Carolina PAT rules require two consecutive check‑ins for adaptability and staff are working with instructional coaches and district leadership to select the best administration.

Abernathy recommended continued monitoring and targeted interventions and invited questions from the board. No formal action was taken on testing practices at the meeting.