Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Title I topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District projects lower Title I funds; staff propose adjusted eligibility thresholds
Summary
Polk County staff told the board that federal and district data shifts mean Title I allocations could decline; staff proposed sliding thresholds (elementary 73%, middle 70%) and noted final counts depend on April survey data and charter openings.
Get email alerts on the Title I topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff told the Polk County School Board on Feb. 10 that changes in federal funding calculations and local direct-certification counts are likely to reduce Title I Part A allocations for next year and that staff are recommending modest changes to district eligibility thresholds.
Andy Baldwin, senior director for federal programs, said the U.S. budget passed Feb. 3 but state and district allocations can still shift when the Department of Education applies the distribution formula. "In the past, we've been able to roll forward approximately $15,000,000 each year. And this year, we're anticipating we'll only have about $10,000,000 to spend," Baldwin said, attributing the expected decline to lower allocations and higher current-year spending.
Baldwin explained Polk uses direct certification counts for Title I eligibility (students identified through SNAP, homelessness, migrant status and similar indicators) and that the district's percentage of children of low-income families (CLIF) has fallen, reducing Title I shares. Based on current Survey 2 data, he said 111 schools project above the 75% CLIF threshold that would require Title I services. To preserve support for some current Title I schools, staff proposed a district adjustment that would set an elementary threshold at 73% and a middle-school threshold at 70% and allow limited grandfathering where appropriate.
Board members questioned drivers behind the CLIF changes and data reliability. Chair Mister Sharpless noted a steep drop in the CLIF counts and asked whether the district saw a true demographic change or a data artifact; Baldwin and Hyde said final Survey 3 counts in April will be determinative and flagged changes in SNAP eligibility and statewide migrant population shifts as contributing factors.
Baldwin also outlined operational details of Title I use: most schools allocate 90'95% of Title I funds to staffing (reading coaches, interventionists, paraeducators), with other uses including professional time, summer programs and curriculum subscriptions. He reiterated that charter and private-school service obligations are handled according to statute (charters identified the same way and private schools receive an equitable amount of service purchased on their behalf; the district cannot pass funds directly to private schools).
No board vote was taken at the workshop; Baldwin asked the board to use the next two weeks to submit any questions before a formal agenda item.

