York City SD committee reviews January finances, approves December minutes
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
The committee approved December minutes and reviewed a January financial report showing a roughly $208 million budget and a projected fund balance of about $71.1 million; members flagged uncertainty about whether new state budget increases will be recurring or one-time.
The York City School District committee approved the minutes from its December meeting and reviewed the district’s January financial report during its most recent session.
Sean, who presented the financial summary, said the district’s revenue picture is on track for the year and that real estate taxes make up the largest portion of the 6,000-series revenue. “So overall, the revenue’s about 51% of the budget,” Sean said, describing year-to-date collections as consistent with seasonal timing of tax receipts.
The presentation showed the district’s current operating budget is about $208,000,000. Chris Marchese, who said he could not access the documents through the York City portal, summarized his understanding that revenues and expenditures were roughly $209,000,000 and that the projected fund balance at year-end was about $71,100,000; Sean confirmed the current budget figure and that the fund-balance estimate reflected January’s data.
Sean told the committee most expense categories are tracking between 40% and 50% through January, with summer-program lines front-loading 1,400-series spending. He also noted the district is no longer receiving ESSER funds and that federal program receipts currently consist of Title I–IV funding. A refund related to a previously anticipated property purchase was noted as a one-time adjustment in the report.
Members raised a broader concern about the governor’s recent budget changes. The Moderator said the state concentrated additional dollars into a single category in the governor’s proposal and asked whether that increase would be added to the district’s base funding or be treated as a one-time payment; members said that distinction is important for 2026–27 planning. “We’re worried about how much of that is going to be added to the base and how much is just gonna be a one time revenue,” the Moderator said.
Before turning to the agenda’s next item, the committee voted to approve the December minutes. The motion was made by Chris Marchese and seconded by Sean; the Moderator called the vote and recorded ayes from attending members, and the motion carried.
The committee directed staff to resend the December financial materials to members who could not access them and to continue compiling draft budget numbers for the 2026–27 cycle for review in March or April.