Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Future Land Use Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Titusville Environmental Commission reaffirms edits to Future Land Use policy, adopts written rationale
Summary
The Titusville Environmental Commission voted unanimously to reaffirm prior strike-through edits to Future Land Use policy 1.16.0.2 and accepted a written rationale prepared by Mary Spar, asking staff to carry the rationale to planning staff for the city council packet.
The Titusville Environmental Commission voted unanimously to reaffirm the commission’s previously proposed strike-through edits to Future Land Use policy 1.16.0.2 and accepted a written rationale for those edits.
The motion to recommend approval of the strike-through text was made by a commission member and carried on a roll-call vote of the members present. After that vote, the commission voted to accept the written rationale prepared by Mary Spar and instructed staff to forward it to planning staff and to Brad (city staff) for inclusion in future materials.
Commission members discussed the policy edits at length, focusing on transcription and reference corrections to the comprehensive-plan language (clarifying objective numbers and replacing the word “date” with “data” where appropriate). Mary said the rationale explains why the strike-through language is no longer necessary after an ordinance change that allowed PD zoning within conservation land-use areas, and that the rationale should be passed to staff so the administrative record is clear.
The action authorizes staff to proceed with the documentation of the TEC’s recommendation; commissioners agreed the vote reduces future confusion arising from conflicting language in the comprehensive plan and local ordinance. No further substantive changes to policy 1.16.0.2 were adopted at the meeting; the commission limited this action to reaffirming the previously drafted edits and formally accepting the accompanying rationale.
The matter of how the city applies permitting standards (policy 1.16.0.4) was not resolved; commissioners agreed to defer that sentence to a future meeting pending additional staff review.
