Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Closed Session topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sacramento City Council convenes closed session to consider appointments, evaluations and litigation

Sacramento City Council · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Sacramento City Council called a closed session at 12:03 p.m. to consider six items: two public-employee appointment matters for the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency, performance evaluations for the Office of Public Safety Accountability director and the city clerk, labor negotiations and existing litigation (Michael Flynn v. City of Sacramento).

The Sacramento City Council convened a special closed session at 12:03 p.m. to address six agenda items, the council announced at the start of the meeting.

The council listed two public-employee appointment matters for the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) and two performance evaluations: one for the director of the Office of Public Safety Accountability and one for the city clerk. The meeting also included a conference with legal counsel over existing litigation and a conference with labor negotiators.

“We have no speakers on any of the items on the closed session agenda,” an unidentified speaker said as the council confirmed a quorum and read the items into the record. The legal item was described as Michael Flynn versus City of Sacramento, Sacramento County Superior Court case number 24202000285390. The agency-designated representative for labor negotiations was named as Mayor McCarty with the subject listed as city clerk.

The council proceeded to adjourn into closed session after a vice mayor was instructed, “Vice mayor, you may adjourn to close session.” The announcement and adjournment indicate the council will consider personnel and litigation matters in private session under the cited provisions of the California Government Code.

No votes or public deliberations were recorded in the open portion of the meeting, and the council noted there were no members of the public signed to speak on the closed-session items. The council did not disclose outcomes or actions from the closed session in the transcript provided.

The council’s next public actions or any formal disclosures following the closed session were not specified in the transcript.