Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cell Phone Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory committee wrestles with scope and enforcement of state-mandated cell-phone policy
Summary
Committee members debated whether the state-required personal electronic device policy should apply only to instructional minutes or to the entire school day, how to handle buses and field trips, and how to balance enforcement, exceptions (IEP/medical/MLL), and teacher expectations.
The North Kingstown Policy Advisory Committee spent the bulk of its Feb. 12 meeting drafting a district policy to comply with a state law that requires public-school systems to adopt rules limiting student access to personal electronic devices by Sept. 2026. Assistant Superintendent Rob Esenadi told the committee the drafting group included administrators, teachers, students and parents, and that the group favored a policy setting core expectations while leaving enforcement details to building handbooks.
Committee members debated several core issues: whether the prohibition should apply only during "instructional minutes" (the Department of Education definition discussed by counsel) or "bell-to-bell" for the full school day; whether buses and off-site school-sponsored activities (field trips, pep rallies) should be included; and how to treat medical, IEP and multilingual-learner (MLL) exceptions. Attorney Andrew Ennias read statute language about penalties and emphasized the need to reference statutory text in the draft.
Members discussed practical enforcement tools (lockers, Yonder charging pouches and pilot locking devices), the distinction between school-managed devices such as Chromebooks (which are covered by the district's responsible-use policies) and students' personal devices, and potential consequences. The committee agreed not to include out-of-school suspensions for PED violations in district policy and to add explicit references to IEP/medical/MLL exceptions as required by law. Rob Esenadi was asked to prepare a cleaned-up draft that includes statutory citations, clear definitions of "school day" and "school-sponsored activities," and recommended handbook-level progressive consequences for administrators to apply.
The committee will reconvene to continue edits; no final district-level prohibition was adopted at the meeting.
