Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Liquor Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Suamico board declines broad open‑container change for NFL Draft week, opts to keep current permits
Summary
After extended debate and public comment about temporarily allowing outdoor, walkable alcohol consumption during the NFL Draft, the Suamico Village Board voted 5–2 to adhere to existing ordinances and rely on temporary permits rather than a villagewide exception.
Trustee Andrews moved Monday that the board “adhere to the current ordinances and laws and direction that public health and safety provided us,” and the motion passed 5–2, preserving existing limits on open containers and the village’s permit process for temporary premise extensions.
The discussion began after Trustee Neto asked the board to consider changing local liquor rules for the NFL Draft period to allow licensed establishments to expand premises and allow alcohol consumption in outdoor areas and parking lots. Deputy Keisig and public‑safety staff reported the Public Health & Safety Committee recommended no changes, citing enforcement concerns. Several trustees said the existing temporary‑permit process already allows premise extensions; others, including Trustee Neto and local business owners, argued a broader exception could help attract visitors during the multi‑day draft event.
Resident Sue Yashik, who said she has worked with Downtown Green Bay planning for draft events, told the board that closing blocks and organizing multiple events has drawn thousands in other communities and presented an opportunity for Suamico businesses: “If your intent is to bring business to Suamico and create opportunity for our local establishments to take advantage of the draft, I can tell you as a resident, I wasn't aware of getting a sticker to go to another bar.” Trustees weighing safety concerns said dark streets, limited enforcement resources during a large regional event, and state law limitations on open containers argued against a broad, villagewide exception; several recommended targeted, permit‑based solutions in Vickery Village or individual parking lots.
After public comment the board opened and closed the public‑comment period and voted on Trustee Andrews’ motion to retain current ordinances and rely on public‑health and safety guidance. The motion passed on roll call 5–2 (Trustee Neto and Trustee Romas voted nay). The board indicated it could revisit the issue if businesses come forward to request temporary permits.
