Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bull Creek Conservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bull Creek Commonlands conservation project described to Senate; $315,000 VHCB grant cited
Summary
Bull Creek Commonlands leaders told the Senate Institutions committee they conserved about 341 acres in a headwaters complex, reported a total project cost of $950,000 and said a VHCB (BHCB) grant covered roughly $315,000 of acquisition and related work.
Get email alerts on the Bull Creek Conservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bull Creek Commonlands representatives briefed the Senate Institutions committee on Feb. 13 about a recent conservation closing in the headwaters of Bull Creek, describing habitat, watershed and community benefits and a mix of funding that included a VHCB grant.
Sandra Beagier, chair of Bull Creek Commonlands, said the project closed in November (presentation referenced November 2025) and covered roughly 341 acres across three parcels that bridge the Townsend–Athens town line. She described the site as a high‑priority interior forest and connectivity block containing wetlands, vernal pools and rare species habitat, and said the project preserves public access, trail connections and local hunting and recreation opportunities.
Beagier reported a total project cost of about $950,000 and said roughly one‑third of that — $315,000 — came from a VHCB grant and was split largely toward acquisition costs and associated conservation work; other funding came from the Vermont Land Trust (for an easement), donated land at below‑market value and multiple foundation grants and individual donations. The nonprofit also described on‑the‑ground restoration work supported by NRCS partners, including forest‑road stabilization and water‑bar installation to limit sediment runoff into Bull Creek.
Beagier noted the conservation easement includes protections for a state‑designated archaeological site associated with the locally known "Turtle Lot," preserving stone walls and cultural resources as well as habitat.
Committee members thanked the presenters and asked clarifying budget questions; presenters said some transactional details and precise per‑unit cost data were not provided in the session but can be supplied later.
What happens next: presenters requested continued VHCB funding and legislative support for the board's statutory share so local land‑conservation partnerships can continue to leverage other funds.

