Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Boating Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances bill to bar 'agitators' on small lakes after safety complaints

Energy and Natural Resources · February 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers advanced SB 594 to require removal of agitators where temporary docks must be removed on lakes under 1,000 acres after residents reported enforcement gaps and a child’s fall through thin ice.

Senate Bill 594, introduced by its prime sponsor, would clarify New Hampshire law to require removal of devices that prevent ice formation — commonly called "agitators" or bubblers — when temporary docks on lakes under 1,000 acres must be removed for five months of the year.

A Cottage Pond resident testified that contradictory statutes leave an enforcement gap. "If docks are required to be removed because they pose a safety risk... then these agitators should not be permitted on the same small bodies of water," she said, and recounted that her 11‑year‑old son "went through the ice in February 2025" in an area affected by an agitator. She and New Hampshire Lakes described public‑safety and environmental concerns, including localized thinning of ice and increased aquatic weed survival where water fails to freeze.

Tim Dunleavy of Marine Patrol said his agency is the enforcement authority for devices that prevent ice formation and would not expect added difficulty enforcing a statutory clarification. Andrea Lamoreaux, president and policy advocate for New Hampshire Lakes, urged the committee to act, describing statewide complaints and ecological risks.

After public testimony and agency answers, the committee moved into executive session and voted to report SB 594 "ought to pass"; the motion was made and seconded on the record and passed on consent.

Next steps: SB 594 was reported out of committee on consent. The statute references cited in testimony included RSA 4 18 4 82 and RSA 2 70 (as stated by a public commenter); committee staff should normalize statutory citations in the bill drafting process.