Keystone Central board approves 2026–29 comprehensive plan after heated debate
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
After extended debate over last‑minute timing and a required professional‑learning review, the Keystone Central School District board voted to approve the district’s 2026–29 comprehensive plan, with three ayes, one no and one non‑vote; the approval triggers a 28‑day public review required by state regulation.
The Keystone Central School District Board of Directors voted Feb. 12 to approve the district’s 2026–2029 comprehensive plan despite objections from several members who called the process “eleventh hour.” The motion passed by a narrow margin of three yes, one no and one member recorded as “present” (non‑vote). Dr. Redmond told the board the approval was required to satisfy Pennsylvania Department of Education timelines and that a 28‑day public review period follows board approval.
Board members who opposed the timing said they wanted more time for a professional‑learning plan review and criticized the district’s process for bringing the plan to the floor so close to the deadline. Board member Chris (last name not stated in the transcript) described the timing as “bad for culture” and urged additional committee review before final approval. Another director pressed for an explanation of the assessment tools referenced in the plan and said he did not support mandating the state test for graduation; those points were raised during debate but not adopted as conditions for approval.
Administrators said the comprehensive plan itself — which sets district goals — was complete and that the outstanding item was a linked professional‑learning plan that a small review committee would check before its submission to the state. “It’s a regulation,” one administrator said when asked whether the requirement to submit a professional‑learning plan is state‑driven. The board then voted to approve the comprehensive plan “as presented with the consideration of any findings or comments from the professional learning committee,” and subsequently appointed three community members to that committee.
The board’s vote means the district will proceed with the required 28‑day public posting and review period. Board members said they retain the ability to revisit the plan during a mid‑term evaluation that the administration said the state also expects. The district did not provide additional detail on specific assessment instruments or the precise changes the professional‑learning committee might recommend.
What’s next: The board appointed Elsie Robinson (parent), Shane Packer (community/Kiwanis) and Sam Shea (PMF Industries) to the professional‑learning review committee; the committee’s findings will be incorporated as required by state processes.