Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oakland commission declines emergency ordinance to set procedures for ethics complaints
Summary
The Town of Oakland commission considered an emergency ordinance that would have required officials to notify the town attorney and insurer when a Florida Commission on Ethics complaint is filed and set procedures for legal representation; after extensive debate and public comment, the commission voted not to adopt the emergency ordinance and directed staff to redraft it for a future meeting.
The Town of Oakland commission considered — and rejected — an emergency ordinance that would have laid out procedures for officials facing complaints to the Florida Commission on Ethics, including early notification to the town attorney and insurance carrier and a process for selecting counsel.
"This ordinance does not provide any right to compensation for attorney's fees," Stephanie, the town attorney, told the commission, adding that the draft would let the town "alert our insurance company and our insurance defense counsel as to the existence of a potential claim" and give the town a say in representation. She said early notification improves the town's chance of insurance coverage.
Several commissioners objected to labeling the measure an "emergency ordinance." Mayor Shane Taylor said he did not believe the situation met the typical definition of an emergency, noting that Florida case law already recognizes a public officer's entitlement to representation in some circumstances. "I don't believe this is an emergency," Taylor said during debate.
Other commissioners defended taking immediate action to protect taxpayers from large, privately hired legal bills. One commissioner argued that without an adopted procedure a member could hire private counsel and later seek reimbursement from the town, possibly imposing heavy, unplanned costs on residents.
Residents who spoke during the public forum urged caution and deliberation. "I don't even know what this accusation is," said resident Chris Keller; he and others suggested using the upcoming election and the charter-review process to address residency or process questions rather than rushing a measure that could obligate town funds.
After extended discussion about insurance notification timing, whether to include an hourly cap for attorney fees if insurance denies coverage, and the scope of an emergency finding, a motion to adopt the emergency ordinance failed. The town attorney said the procedures in the draft are not effective without adoption. The commission directed staff and counsel to rework the draft and return with a revised ordinance for future consideration.
