Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weatherization program short on BIL drawdowns; jury accepts donated F‑150 and trailer and moves to pursue cost‑sharing with nine parishes
Summary
DeSoto Parish accepted an F‑150 and a weatherization mobile unit trailer donated by the Louisiana Housing Corporation and debated how to cover continuing weatherization work while Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) funds are temporarily on hold; staff projected near‑term invoice amounts and jurors voted to review contracts and consider cooperative agreements (CEAs) with nine other parishes.
The Community Service & Development panel accepted a donation from the Louisiana Housing Corporation of an F‑150 pickup and a weatherization mobile unit trailer to be used in the parish weatherization program. Staff said the donation is free but that the parish would bear insurance and any repair costs; mileage and vehicle condition were not specified in the record.
Much of the meeting focused on fiscal pressure caused by delays in drawing down Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) funds. Michelle Hughes, the weatherization coordinator, told jurors the program operates on three funding pots (regular Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Energy funds, plus the BIL allocation). She said the BIL component has been effectively frozen while project officers at federal or state offices are temporarily unreachable, and staff are working to reallocate and amend contracts so the program can continue operating.
Hughes provided near‑term projections of invoices and indirect BIL amounts: January invoices totaling about $88,000 (about $18,000 of which was identified as BIL indirect), February roughly $74,000 (about $15,000 BIL indirect) and March about $55,400 (about $15,000 BIL indirect). Staff said DeSoto fronts funds for this program on behalf of 10 parishes (DeSoto plus nine neighboring parishes) and that the parish normally waits for reimbursement; jurors discussed the risk that continued fronting could require transfers from the general fund or staff reductions if federal reimbursements remain delayed.
Jurors asked staff to assemble contract information and to draft possible cooperative endeavor agreements (CEAs) with the nine participating parishes to clarify upfront cost responsibilities. The panel voted to add a report on existing contracts and proposed CEAs to a future regular meeting agenda and to proceed with preparing draft agreements if legally appropriate.
Next steps: staff to prepare contract review and draft CEA language for the regular meeting; no layoffs were mandated at this session, and jurors discussed options including carrying on at current staffing levels or restricting work if funds are not received.
