Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Adu topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Newark council narrows ADU incentives, approves zoning changes with 4–1 vote
Summary
After a staff presentation and council debate over parking, height and fee waivers, the council approved zoning text amendments to update Newark's ADU/JADU rules to comply with state law and add incentives; the council removed an extra 2-foot height allowance as part of the motion (4–1). Second reading is scheduled for February; any ordinance will take effect 30 days after adoption.
The Newark City Council on Jan. 22 approved zoning changes intended to bring the city's accessory dwelling unit (ADU) and junior ADU (JADU) rules into compliance with recent state law and to add local incentives to encourage ADU construction. Council members voted 4–1 to adopt staff's recommended text amendments with one change: the council eliminated a staff-proposed extra 2-foot height allowance for detached ADUs.
Associate planner Joseph Blotbat, presenting the item, said the proposed amendment updates NMC section 17.26.040 and the use classification in 17.45.010 to incorporate state-exempt ADU rules, simplify setbacks and height limits, and add incentives on height, size and impact fees. Blotbat said the amendment would allow some detached ADUs up to 1,200 square feet under the incentive option, raise the size threshold for impact-fee exemptions to 800 square feet, remove lot-coverage limits for ADUs over 800 square feet and adopt objective design standards to streamline review.
The changes are intended to implement the city's housing element and to make ADU rules easier for homeowners to use. Blotbat said state law allows ministerial approval for certain state-exempt ADUs and limits the kinds of local standards that may be applied to those units.
Council members used the public hearing and subsequent discussion to press staff on how the changes would affect parking, neighborhood character and the city's quantified ADU objectives. "If that includes eliminated parking for the main dwelling, then you could do so," Blotbat told the council when asked whether a 12-unit property could be converted to detached ADUs in surface parking. Several council members said they supported increasing ADU production but were wary of eliminating parking requirements and of height or design outcomes that might not fit neighborhood character.
Council member Bridal moved to accept staff's recommendation but remove the additional 2-foot allowance; council member Little seconded the motion. The motion passed 4–1 with Council member Contagio recorded as the lone no vote. The mayor and staff said the ordinance will return for a second reading in February; if adopted at second reading the ordinance will take effect 30 days later.
Because the amendments incorporate state-exempt ADU standards, some ADU types would remain ministerial (not subject to discretionary review). Staff said the city will submit the adopted ordinance to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review as required by state law.
What happens next: the council scheduled a second reading in February. Staff will post the final ordinance and the code changes online and will update the ADU guidance materials used by residents seeking permits.
Who said what (examples): "An ADU is an additional residential unit that is accessory to a primary dwelling and has complete independent living facilities," associate planner Joseph Blotbat explained. Council member Bridal said she supported ADU production but preferred to comply with the state's base height requirements rather than allow the extra 2-foot incentive. Council member Contagio voted no on the motion.
The record of the hearing and staff report include detailed proposed text changes to NMC 17.26.040 and 17.45.010 and a CEQA exemption determination for the zoning text amendment.
