Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy 819 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Central York policy committee advances updated suicide prevention policy to first reading
Summary
The Central York policy committee reviewed revisions to Policy 819 (Suicide Awareness, Prevention and Response), debated notification and documentation rules including confidentiality and records retention, and voted to bring the revised policy forward as a first read at the next meeting.
The Central York policy committee continued review of Policy 819, the districts Suicide Awareness, Prevention and Response policy, and agreed to bring the revised policy forward for a first reading at the next meeting. Chair (Speaker 1) opened the discussion by noting, "we are still, working through policy 8 19, our suicide awareness prevention and response policy."
Committee members focused on three practical areas: clarifying the districts coordination with the Safe to Say Something program, defining when students, employees and families should be notified after attempts or a confirmed suicide, and documenting retention and access to behavioral health records. On the Safe to Say Something section, members confirmed a definitional sentence had been added and discussed whether the phrase "local law enforcement and or district team" leaves the district discretion; Speaker 3 said they were "glad that we have that in there."
Members flagged confidentiality and scope as the meetings central operational concerns. As Speaker 2 asked, "to what degree do we need to communicate to students, to employees who may not be involved with that child?" committee members proposed limiting notices to the involved students parents or guardians and notifying other parents, students or employees "when appropriate." The group agreed that a detailed administrative regulation (AR) should be developed to guide staff on what details to share and when, and to reflect family wishes after a confirmed death by suicide.
The committee also debated reentry procedures for students returning after a behavioral health crisis. Members recommended language to avoid creating a hard barrier to reentry if a parent is not immediately available, suggesting formulations such as "shall attempt to schedule" or "prior to or as soon as practical" for parent/guardian meetings. Speaker 4 said using "as soon as practical" would allow the district flexibility while preserving the intent that staff follow up with families.
On documentation and records, members asked that the policy cite Policy 800 (records retention) and clarified how counseling or psych files would be stored and retained; one speaker noted current practices that result in records being scanned and retained for an extended period (a retention length of "99 years" was mentioned during the discussion). The committee asked staff to verify retention periods and hyperlink resources included in the policy language.
Legal counsel (Mister Zelenka) was invited to consult on implementation details and recordkeeping; the committee thanked him for attending. With those clarifications noted, Speaker 1 asked the committee if they were "okay with taking this as something we're bringing the first read next meeting," and members assented. The committee adjourned after scheduling the first-read forward action.
Next steps: staff will draft administrative regulations to clarify notification, confidentiality, reentry processes and documentation practice, verify referenced resources and retention timelines, and place the revised Policy 819 on the agenda for a first reading at the next policy committee meeting.
