Park City council approves resolution to call public hearing on TIF district at 69th and Broadway

Park City City Council · February 11, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council voted 6-0 to approve a resolution calling a March 24 public hearing to consider creating a tax-increment financing (TIF) redevelopment district at 69th Street North and Broadway after a developer presentation described floodplain remediation, phased housing and an estimated $59–$79 million private investment.

Park Citycouncil on Feb. 10 voted unanimously to approve a resolution calling a March 24 public hearing on whether to create a tax-increment financing (TIF) redevelopment district at 69th Street North and Broadway.

Dominic Ek of Gilmore & Bell opened the discussion by outlining the TIF process: a TIF does not raise new taxes but redirects taxes generated by new property valuation in a defined area to pay eligible project costs, with district formation followed later by a project plan that would set the share of increment and details.

Tim Austin of Iron Horse Development told the council the roughly 145-acre site was largely in the FEMA 100-year floodplain and that remediation would require significant earthwork. He said the developercs concept envisions about 83 acres to be filled for development (roughly 66 acres for mixed-use residential and 17 acres to remain industrial), with housing types ranging from single-family to duplexes and garden-style multifamily. Austin estimated the private investment at between $59 million and $79 million, an expected TIF increment of about $18 million and a budgetary captured TIF of roughly $4.25 million.

Austin and his team described the projectcs drainage rationale: a county study identified roughly 920 acre-feet of additional storage needed in the West Branch of Chisholm Creek basin, and the studycs mitigation estimate was about $25 million. Because much of the parcel sits in mapped floodplain, developers would need to raise and fill the site and obtain FEMA letters of map revision to permit construction; Austin estimated average fill of about 3 feet, roughly 330,000 cubic yards.

Council members pressed on risk and safeguards. Austin said developers would post letters of credit and special-assessment petitions similar to other developments, and that if the market failed to produce expected value the developer would remain obligated on assessments; subsequent owners would pay property taxes on the site if it were sold. Bond counsel and staff emphasized that the Feb. 10 resolution only calls a public hearing; specific TIF terms, percentages of increment, and the project plan would be decided in subsequent steps and subject to additional public hearings and planning commission review. County and school-district jurisdictions will also be formally notified and have statutory review opportunities.

Councilmember Jim Schrader moved to approve resolution 12-75-2026 to call a public hearing; John Wells seconded. The motion passed 6-0.

Next procedural steps: the council will hold a public hearing on March 24; if the council moves forward, the city will return with a project plan and development agreement for further hearings and approvals.