Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environmental Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Colorado Senate adopts ban on discharge of preproduction plastic materials after debate over enforcement and penalties
Summary
The Senate passed Senate Bill 16 to prohibit discharges of preproduction plastic materials (pellets, flakes, fibers) and to bar CDPHE permits for their disposal. Sponsors said the measure targets corporate facilities and prevention; opponents warned the bill could duplicate existing criminal pollution law and impose steep penalties.
Get email alerts on the Environmental Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Colorado Senate on Feb. 12 approved Senate Bill 16, a measure that prohibits the discharge of preproduction plastic materials — commonly called plastic pellets — from corporate manufacturing, packaging or transport facilities and prevents the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment from issuing permits to allow their disposal.
Senator Tammy Cutter, the bill's sponsor, said the measure is targeted at preventing pollution at the source, not at regulating individuals: "They're the feedstock. Because they are so small and lightweight, they can be spilled at almost every step of the production process," Cutter said, arguing the materials are ubiquitous and long‑lasting in the environment.
Supporters contended the bill focuses on prevention rather than permission and that amendments adopted in committee clarified definitions, effective dates and exempted wastewater treatment facilities and recycling processes. "Both L7 and L8 make it clear we're talking about preproduction plastic materials and not any other pollutants," Senator Wallace said after moving several companion amendments.
Opponents raised enforcement and fiscal concerns. Senator Kirkmeyer asked where civil penalties would be deposited and sought clarity on enforcement mechanisms. Senator Catlin pointed to an existing criminal pollution statute (CRS 25-8-609) and urged that the state refrain from duplicative regulation: "Under current law, offenses surrounding criminal pollution are already clearly defined," Catlin said. Senator Bazely warned the bill's broad definition could unintentionally sweep in other materials and impose criminal penalties that harm Colorado industry.
Senator Cutter responded that the bill "simply defines plastic pellets under that same statute" and noted an earlier floor comment that civil penalties would be deposited into the Water Quality Improvement Fund.
On the floor, the Senate adopted several committee amendments (L9, L7, L8, L6) that sponsors said refine definitions and legislative intent. After debate and the amendment votes, the Senate agreed on final passage; the clerk recorded adoption as "the ayes have it." The transcript does not record a floor roll-call tally at final passage for SB 16 in the segments provided.
What happens next: As passed by the Senate, SB 16 will be enrolled and transmitted according to legislative procedures for final processing and, if enacted, will assign statutory authority and enforcement responsibilities to state agencies identified in the bill text.
