Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities And Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves architects/CM contract for Council Rock work, adopts two student‑health policies

BRIGHTON CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION · January 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Brighton board approved a professional services contract (SWBR and construction manager) for Council Rock construction planning and adopted policies 7513 (medication and personal care items) and 7521 (students with life‑threatening health conditions); policy 5661 (wellness) was tabled for further review.

At the Jan. 7 meeting, the board approved a professional services contract to continue work with SWBR and a negotiated contract for an architect and construction manager to support planned Council Rock classroom work.

"Really, it's only our agreement to continue to move forward with our partners at SWBR and, you know, a negotiated contract," Dr. Hargala said during the contract discussion, describing the approach to fee structure and oversight. The board approved the contract after questions and a second by Christina.

On policy, the chair read three items on second reading: policy 7513 (medication and personal care items), policy 7521 (students with life‑threatening health conditions) and policy 5661 (wellness). The board moved to approve policies 7513 and 7521 and tabled policy 5661 for additional review.

Board members said the Council Rock construction planning is intended to improve equity in classrooms and that owner‑architect‑construction‑manager (OACM) meetings have been used to plan work across 2025–2027. No contract dollar amounts were read into the record at the meeting; contract documents and fee structures are included in the meeting materials referenced in the agenda.

The board also reviewed a settlement recommendation related to a tax proceeding involving the Country Club of Rochester and the Town of Brighton and voted to approve that settlement recommendation.

The board’s approvals at the meeting were procedural votes recorded on the public agenda; no additional policy changes tied to the construction contract or settlement were described in the meeting record.