Witness testifies there was no planful coordination between ICE/DHS and local law enforcement

Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ยท February 12, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An unnamed senator asked whether ICE or DHS coordinated immigration-enforcement operations with state and local authorities. A witness testified there was no "planful approach," that target lists were not shared, and that the lack of coordination created public-safety burdens in Minnesota.

An unnamed senator asked whether U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or the Department of Homeland Security had coordinated their enforcement operations with state and local law enforcement or given advance notice when conducting such actions.

A witness before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs said there has been no "planful approach" to coordination. "There has not been, efforts to coordinate or discuss, their targets," the witness said, adding: "We have not been provided with a list of targets."

The witness told the committee that the absence of planning and information-sharing left local agencies unable to focus on the subset of individuals who might pose the greatest risk. The witness said the lack of coordination produced a "crisis driven" dynamic in which, when operations escalated, local law enforcement was sometimes pressed into protecting ICE operations rather than being part of an organized response. "I think a lot of this could have been avoided," the witness said.

Committee members pressed for consequences of the coordination gap; the senator noted the witness's prior law-enforcement experience and asked what danger to public safety and local officers results from the lack of communication. The witness reiterated that lacking target lists and an agreed plan increases operational strain on local agencies and can divert resources from other public-safety priorities.

The hearing record shows testimony that DHS and ICE coordination with state and local authorities was limited and that officials at the local level had not been provided with enforcement-target information that could have allowed more targeted responses. No formal decision or vote on policy was recorded in the provided transcript.