FAA CAST highlighted as a voluntary, non‑punitive model; presenter credits it with large safety gains

California Public Utilities Commission working group on safety culture and open information flow · February 13, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An FAA representative explained CAST’s voluntary reporting model to the California working group, saying leadership commitment not to use reports for enforcement (except criminal behavior) unlocked system‑wide sharing; the presenter said CAST coincided with an over‑80% reported drop in fatal aviation accidents within a decade.

Chris, who presented the FAA CAST experience, described how a voluntary, system‑wide reporting program was launched to overcome a safety plateau in aviation. He said the FAA administrator at the time decided against relying solely on "more money" or "a bigger stick," instead inviting industry to collaborate voluntarily and share hazards so the whole system could learn.

Chris described a foundational assumption: "errors and near misses usually reflect a defective process and not a defective person." He told the group the FAA administrator made a visible promise that voluntarily shared information would not be used for enforcement except in cases of criminal or intentional wrongdoing: "I will not ... use any of it for enforcement unless it reflects criminal or intentional wrongdoing." According to Chris, that leadership commitment and voluntary participation produced dramatic outcomes: "In less than 10 years ... it dropped more than 80%" in the fatal accident rate, a figure he presented as the program’s reported result.

Chris emphasized that CAST is voluntary, system‑focused and cross‑industry, which helped remove adversarial dynamics and brought stakeholders, including labor, into constructive dialogue. He also said the FAA’s approach made it easier to identify unintended consequences early and to co‑design mitigations because all affected parties were involved in solution development.

California working‑group participants asked whether the aviation model maps onto utilities; Chris said aspects are transferable but context matters and he offered to follow up with deeper briefings. The working group noted the CAST example during its later discussion about trust, confidentiality and whether a voluntary, jointly owned reporting mechanism could be piloted in the utility sector.