Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Salary Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council tables exempt/nonexempt salary-designations, approves other salary adjustments
Summary
Councilors tabled the salary-ordinance items that would reclassify exempt versus nonexempt positions pending HR and legal review under FLSA, and approved a set of other salary amendments including highway and community corrections changes.
Councilors reviewed multiple salary-ordinance amendments affecting several funds and positions. Staff noted that salary calculations can vary depending on how the calculation is performed, producing minor differences; the packet highlighted positions where pay changes would be minimal.
Members focused on whether specific positions should be designated exempt or nonexempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act. County staff and the county attorney said the exempt/nonexempt determination is an individualized analysis tied to job duties and recommended HR and legal vet job descriptions before any classification changes. "You just don't get to opt to make someone nonexempt or to make someone exempt because that would be a benefit to the employer," one counsel noted, explaining the need for a case-by-case assessment.
Given differing legal opinions and to allow HR review, the council voted to table all salary-ordinance items that involved exempt versus nonexempt designations. Separately, after motions and roll-call votes, the council approved highway job-title and salary-cap changes and several other salary-ordinance adjustments, some tied to grant timing and fund source clarifications.
Next steps: HR and legal counsel will reconcile the job descriptions and present recommended classifications and salary calculations at a future meeting. The council said it will consider the withheld items after HR'legal review.
