Board debates PSBA policy renumbering, Act 55 training and extracurricular GPA language
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
Board members discussed proposed PSBA policy updates and the organization of policies 1.22 and 1.23 (extracurriculars and athletics), debated where GPA eligibility language should appear, and reviewed Act 55 training and PSBA’s role; members agreed to place clarified language on display and vote in March.
Board members spent substantial time reviewing a batch of policy updates provided by PSBA and discussing how the district will incorporate recent guidance under Act 55. The conversation centered on how to split existing policy 1.22.1 (athletics and extracurriculars) into clearer sections and where to retain or migrate language that governs academic eligibility (three-, six- and nine-week GPA checks).
One board member summarized the intent: the state’s Act 55 amends Pennsylvania school code and mandates required training; PSBA provides sample policy language and a recommended numbering system. Board members said PSBA’s numbering can change over time, which complicated whether the district should mirror PSBA numbering exactly or describe policy references by function. Several members urged that existing GPA and participation requirements not be lost when policies are reorganized.
A motion was made to adjust the policy numbering and placement; board members concluded that the pragmatic path was to embed the relevant GPA and eligibility language into the policy 1.23 draft and place the revised language "on display" for the required review period before a March vote. A board member cautioned that simply renaming numbers without updating cross-references in other policies could create confusion; staff agreed to copy the interscholastic language into the intended policy and follow the formal display and approval process.
Board members also discussed compliance and enforcement: outside organizations (for example PIAA for athletics) impose monitoring that does not apply to non-district extracurriculars, and the district agreed the sponsor/advisor for each extracurricular would be responsible for ensuring participation requirements are met. No final policy vote occurred; members directed staff to post the clarified drafts for the required display period and bring a finalized proposal to the March meeting.
Separately, one board member read a statement denouncing racist imagery posted by some public officials and urged citizens to vote; the board acknowledged the statement but did not take formal action.