Committee advances bill repealing 75% annexation exception after mixed testimony
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
The Select Water Committee passed HB 76, which would repeal the section of state law that exempts parcels surrounded on 75% of their perimeter from certain annexation protest procedures. Municipal and planning officials opposed the repeal citing service, infrastructure and emergency-response concerns; farm- and landowner advocates supported it as a property-rights protection.
Representative Stivaler introduced House Bill 76 as a repeal of paragraph c of section 15-1406, which currently creates an exception for annexations when 75% or more of a parcel’s perimeter abuts a city or town. Stivaler said the repeal restores landowners’ ability to object to annexation and ‘‘gives our citizens more of a say’’ in whether they are brought into municipal jurisdiction.
Charles Bloom, planning development director for the city of Cheyenne, testified in opposition. Bloom said many residents in county ‘‘pocket’’ areas did not know they were outside city limits, noted agreements tying water and sewer service to future annexation for South Cheyenne Water and Sewer District properties, and warned that repeal could create duplicate utility systems and higher long-term infrastructure costs. ‘‘Through our county pocket annexations...we’ve seen examples of fires where there was jurisdictional confusion,’’ Bloom said, arguing unified jurisdiction improves emergency response.
Bob McCluren of the Wyoming Association of Municipalities joined Bloom in opposition, saying parcels surrounded on three sides ‘‘are functionally a part of that community’’ and urging members to vote no. Kelly Carpenter of the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation testified remotely in support, framing the bill as a protection for private property rights and the ability of landowners to object to being annexed.
Committee members questioned how the repeal would affect existing protest mechanics. Witnesses clarified that the current protest petition process allows 50% of landowners to protest within 20 days of a public hearing, and that the proposed repeal would add verification work for municipal clerks and make annexations more difficult to complete in some cases.
With no amendments offered, Representative Singh moved the bill and Representative Guggenmoss seconded. The committee recorded a roll-call vote with seven ayes and two excused; the clerk announced that HB 76 passed the committee.
The bill now moves to the next legislative stage.