Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Local Budget Taxes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Montcalm County board rejects 1.0‑mill increase for Commission on Aging

Montcalm County Board of Commissioners · February 10, 2026

Summary

After extended discussion, the Montcalm County Board of Commissioners voted 4–3 on Feb. 9 to defeat a resolution that would have placed a 1.0‑mill Commission on Aging increase on the August ballot; proponents said the increase was needed to meet rising service demand and reduce wait lists.

Montcalm County commissioners voted down a proposal Feb. 9 to raise the Commission on Aging millage from 0.45 to 1.0 mil.

Pamela (Pam) Schott, director of the Montcalm County Commission on Aging, presented the proposal and asked the board to approve ballot language so voters could decide. Schott said the increase was necessary to meet rising demand and to avoid capping services or building a large wait list; she said current funding from state and federal sources was expected to be flat. Schott told the board the commission’s fund balance was approximately $625,000 and that its current annual budget was about $1.8 million. She said the agency currently has roughly 20 people on a wait list for services and could hire two to three more home health aides immediately if additional funding were approved.

Commissioners probed the need for the increase and whether the fund balance could be used. Several raised concern about asking taxpayers for an additional levy amid broader efforts to keep county taxes low and said it is the board’s role to vet items before they go to voters.

Commissioner Mohr moved to adopt resolution 2026‑02 to place the 1.0‑mill increase on the August ballot. The board conducted a roll‑call vote: Alexander — Yes; Johnston — Yes; Maher — Yes; Murray — No; Johnson — No; Peterson — No; Carr — No. The motion failed (3 Yes, 4 No). Schott said that if voters reject the August request the commission would seek renewal at 0.45 in later elections.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source