Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impact Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beaumont hears HDR briefing on potential water and wastewater impact fees
Summary
HDR Engineering gave an informational presentation on one-time impact fees for new development, explaining allowable uses, calculation by living‑unit equivalents, required advisory committee steps and public hearings; staff recommended forming a CIAC and beginning a study before council considers any fee amount.
Beaumont city council members heard a detailed, informational briefing Dec. 3 from Grady Reid, a senior project manager with HDR Engineering, on how water and wastewater impact fees work and how the city would adopt them.
Reid told council an impact fee is a one‑time assessment charged to new development to help fund growth‑related capital projects; it does not apply to existing development. He said the fee must be placed in a separate account, may fund construction, land acquisition or debt service for growth‑related projects, and cannot be used for operations, maintenance or to restore capacity lost to deferred maintenance. Reid said school districts are statutorily exempt unless they agree by contract.
Reid outlined how fees are calculated: the city would determine the service area and land‑use assumptions, estimate future demands, compare those to existing capacity, and use the 10‑year capital improvement program to identify projects tied to growth. He said fees are typically set on a per‑LUE (living unit equivalent) basis and scaled to meter size using factors such as those from the American Water Works Association. Under Texas law (Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code), the consultant said cities may either cap the fee at one half of the weighted cost per LUE or perform a rate‑credit calculation to avoid double charging new users.
Reid described the implementation process: the city would work with a Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) — commonly the planning and zoning commission with added ETJ representation — to review the draft report, then hold two public‑notice and hearing steps before council action. He estimated a first‑time adoption timeline of roughly 70–80 days after the CIAC work is complete, though he cautioned actual timing often runs longer.
Council members asked about economic impacts and equity. Reid said he has not seen consistent evidence that impact fees push development to neighboring jurisdictions, noting fee levels and local housing costs influence developer decisions. He and staff recommended the council form the CIAC, continue refining data with HDR, and bring a draft ordinance and impact‑fee report back to council once the study is complete.
The presentation was informational; no fee amounts were proposed or adopted at the meeting.
