Citizen Portal

Averill Park board flags health insurance, enrollment and staffing as top budget pressures

AVERILL PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT · February 9, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff told the Averill Park Central School District board that health insurance now accounts for roughly 20% of the budget, roughly matching the governor’s proposed foundation aid increase, and outlined possible staffing changes, program impacts and a potential in‑house UPK opportunity if state funding is approved.

Unidentified Speaker 1, a district presenter, told the Averill Park Central School District board that health insurance has become the district’s largest uncontrollable cost and now makes up "approximately 20% of our budget." He and staff presented budget principles — use data, reduce by attrition when possible, and draw on fund balance as needed — and warned that recurring insurance cost increases could outpace modest state aid gains.

The presentation compared the governor’s proposed foundation aid increase (cited by staff at about $1.0 million, roughly a 2.66% increase) with the district’s projected health insurance increase (also about $1.0 million). "Our health insurance increase is nearly twice as much as our total increase in foundation," Unidentified Speaker 1 said, summarizing the arithmetic that leaves the district facing a budget gap unless offsets are found. He also cited family health-plan costs of roughly $42,000 and individual-plan costs of roughly $16,000 per employee.

Instructional leaders described a targeted 'wish list' of positions the district has kept intentionally small because of budget constraints. Unidentified Speaker 4 said the district continues to seek an elementary social worker to cover three schools and additional music staffing for growing middle-school ensembles; he noted the district restored a high-school business teacher last year after reprioritizing requests.

Board members pressed for context on staffing reductions and enrollment trends. Unidentified Speaker 3 asked whether the district’s elimination of 45 positions since 2000 matched enrollment declines; presenters said they have reduced positions through attrition and that enrollment declines have contributed but vary by grade level. At middle school, staff reported a larger projected drop: an outgoing eighth-grade cohort of about 206 students versus an incoming sixth-grade cohort of about 169.

Presenters outlined program impacts that could follow further cuts: larger class sizes, reduced interventions, fewer special-area offerings (music, electives), changes to co-teaching and shifts in special-education configurations. "We have really been reducing through attrition over time," Unidentified Speaker 1 said, and acknowledged those reductions "have an impact" on programs and facilities upkeep.

Staff also highlighted a possible state-funded opportunity: the governor’s proposal would raise per-student UPK (Universal Prekindergarten) funding from under $6,000 toward $10,000. Unidentified Speaker 4 said that if the state rate were approved, the district could consider running UPK in-house without a local budgetary impact, though the proposal is not yet final and timing complicates implementation.

The board did not take final budget votes at the meeting; staff said the next steps include further refinement of staffing proposals and presentation of budget numbers leading to formal budget adoption and referendum items later in the cycle.