Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Background Checks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Local Government Committee gives favorable recommendation to bill aligning state law with federal background checks
Summary
At its third meeting the House Standing Committee on Local Government recommended House Bill 448 to the full House, after sponsor Representative Tony Hampton said the measure would align Kentucky law with federal background-check rules and members asked about safeguards for juvenile records.
Get email alerts on the Background Checks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The House Standing Committee on Local Government voted to give House Bill 448 a favorable recommendation to the full House after a brief discussion about access to juvenile court records and safeguards for federal background checks.
Representative Tony Hampton introduced the bill and said, "This bill ensures Kentucky law aligns with federal background check requirements for individuals seeking federal employment or federal contract work." Hampton, who identified himself as representing the 60th district (Scott County), was joined at the table by Pat Morgan, retired chief deputy of the Kenton County Sheriff’s Office and assistant director for the Kentucky Sheriff's Association, and Chief Bridal Taylor of the Lawrenceburg Police Department.
Representative Works questioned the inclusion of confidential juvenile records in the bill and asked, "What limits or safeguards would apply to the release of subsequent use of the juvenile court records to ensure that they are solely used for the authorized background check purposes?" Pat Morgan responded, "It only it only remains with, the federal agency. It does not go outside of that agency." The committee did not solicit public testimony; no speakers signed up to speak for or against the bill.
Chair Flannery noted that a similar measure passed the House last year by an 81-to-3 margin, describing this as a repeat bill that had not been broadly controversial. Following the discussion, the chair called the question and the committee moved to a roll-call vote. The committee assistant read members' responses; several members registered "aye" or "yes," and a small number were recorded as "pass." Chair Flannery announced, "Motion does carry with favorable expression that the bill should pass on the house floor."
The committee then adjourned. The next procedural step for House Bill 448 is consideration by the full House; a floor calendar date was not provided during the meeting.

